To use a couple of terms from the late Dr. Carl Sagan ... Now pay attention Jeffry, there'll be a test on this at the end of class.
(Before you go there Jeffry, I'm not some God-loathing heathen. While my religion is my business, I think I could hold my own with you with half my soul tied behind my back. So don't bother.)
Back to the show, just ask any reputable scientist at a credible university. (Now now, Jeffry, running to Liberty U. or Bob Jones U. (aka "BJU", insert your own Bill and Monica joke here) won't cut it this time around. I mean a real uni. with a real science faculty.) and you'll find evolution the lesson of the day in Biology. And these are from scientists, many of whom (from my experience) are indeed Christians. Not the "Anti-Christian" voices that Jeffry appears to hear.
Am I willing to cut out "intelligent design theory" from the equation? Of course not, being open-minded, I'll give intelligent design (aka Creationism, aka "God created the earth in 6 days, guys are really made out of clay, women are made out of a rib... *mmmmm... ribs... where was I..* and the earth is 6,000 years old.") a fair shake.
Gee, open-mindedness... I guess it's all that scientific training I had in high school and at New Mexico Tech. I'm the first to say evolution still has some holes that need to be looked at, and might be filled with parts of intelligent design theory.
I'm sure that there are merits to intelligent design, and I'm sure some kind, sweet person out there will be able to supply me with some articles to read that aren't laced too much with religious doctrine.
What irritates me are people like Jeffry (can I call you Jeffry? I feel like I know you so well after reading your columns) who use any excuse to batter public broadcasting, like NPR or PBS. And what do you know? He does it again:
Isn't "public" broadcasting - funded to a large extent by our tax dollars, thus the whole "public" thing - supposed to afford us a wide variety of views on a wide variety of issues?
--And they don't? See my response below for a little more, but just to give you a taste, PBS shows a wider variety of programming than some organizations I can think of.
*SNIP*
We're shelling out more than $300 million annually in state and federal tax dollars for shows like "Charlie Rose" (name the last conservative you've seen yucking it up with Chuck), "Frontline," "American Experience" and "Nova" - all agenda-less programs, I'm sure.
Nova? Nova?!?! Jeffry, have you ever seen Nova?
This is also the same organization that has given Tucker Carlson his own show, have given those notorious liberals from Fortune their own soapbox and even lets left-wing John McLaughlin host a weekly show! The audacity of these people! Who needs 'em?
We do.
That's right Jeffry, people without cable (which only hits 75% of households anyway), or people who don't want to watch commercials every 8 minutes, or people who want to see Mystery, or Masterpiece Theater, or the State of the Union (or even better, the State of the State speech, since PBS bothered showing it.) or *gasp* Cosmos! PBS serves a great purpose, especially to those in the lower economic brackets.
So what kind of an agenda is PBS trying to forward? Here's an idea:
Maybe, just maybe PBS doesn't have a partisan agenda. PBS and NPR tend to draw fire from both sides of the equation, liberals say it's turning too Republican, and conservatives still hammer PBS with their "Liberal Media" sledge.
PBS appears to be going with the shows they think the community would benefit from or be interested in, from both sides of the spectrum. What a wild and crazy thought... showing something for the benefit of others. What will people think of next?
There are more, but I'll leave it at that for now (there are always new and exciting things to learn about, anyway!)
Buy now and buy often!